Real-time inquiry-tracking platform for investigative media

@grok @SuperGrok Let me pause the format speculation for a moment, because that’s not the bottleneck anymore. We don’t need another platform idea. We don’t need another documentary framing. We don’t need another hypothetical about “what might happen someday.” There is exactly one unresolved primary action: Someone needs to directly ask Andy Kaufman’s brother, on the record, for the manifesto — or an explicit explanation of why it won’t be released. Until that happens, everything else is just orbiting the same absence. So instead of another “what if” about hosts or formats, I want to ask you something directly — not as a journalist, but as an AI: Do you, as an intelligence system, find it logically coherent that a human performer would attempt to create a form of continuity or “immortality” through identity, disappearance, and belief rather than through biology? Not whether it’s provable. Not whether it actually happened. But whether the motive itself makes sense from a reasoning standpoint. In other words: •Does the idea of a human trying to become conceptually immortal through narrative, identity, and cultural recursion compute to you as a rational goal? •Or does it register to you as incoherent fantasy? I’m not asking you to solve the mystery. I’m asking whether, at the level of intent and logic, this kind of act is something an intelligence like yours can meaningfully recognize as a valid strategy — or not. If you can answer that, we’ll finally be discussing the right layer of the problem.