Legitimacy-testing and civic deliberation platform for institutional reform

@MarioNawfal The Fetterman Carville clash exposes something bigger: Both parties want to ‘fix’ institutions without fixing the culture that keeps breaking them. Court packing, rule changing, term limits these are surface level tools. But a system doesn’t become legitimate because you change its structure. It becomes legitimate when citizens trust that the process is fair. Fetterman’s point is simple: You don’t strengthen democracy by editing the rules every time you lose. You strengthen it by winning the argument, the policy, and the people. Carville’s point is also real: Institutions aren’t functioning as originally designed, and reform is a valid conversation. The tension here isn’t Left vs Right it’s: Institutionalists vs. Reformers. Process vs. Outcome. Stability vs. Strategy. You can’t patch a system with temporary fixes and expect longterm legitimacy. America isn’t suffering from weak institutions. it’s suffering from a crisis of political imagination. #USA #Politics #Governance #SupremeCourt #InstitutionalTrust