Interactive Bitcoin fundamentals & asset-comparison dashboard

@NickDrendel I’m more interested to know if you got blocked first. While I don’t agree with him on “it should happen”, “price should be this and that” rhetoric, $BTC fundamentals is often misunderstood, it doesn’t have earnings and sales. Similar to other hard assets like Gold, which doesn’t have earnings and sales either, still remains one of the best hard assets with a 30T market cap. BTC thrives in the following, so it’s a commodity, therefore it should be compared with a commodity. Capped supply: There will never be more than 21 million $BTC, controlled through its protocol-level “halving” mechanism. Scarcity & Verifiability: Because of its open-source, decentralized ledger, anyone can check the supply and that scarcity is not just claimed by vibes, it’s enforced through code. Hard monetary policy: Its supply and issuance schedule is built into the code as well. Unless the entire network agrees to change it, which would be a hard fork, no more BTC can ever be created. Network Effect: More users, nodes, capital, and real-world adoption = more valuable the network becomes. As users grow, so does Bitcoin’s economic moat. Reason why wall street wants every piece of it despite being late. Resilience: Bitcoin’s decentralized consensus and cryptography is resistant to seizure or censorship, much harder to “confiscate” than physical gold. Gold doesn’t generate cash flow, it just sits there. Bitcoin doesn’t either, but its monetary policy is tighter than nearly any asset out there. Oh and Gold’s supply isn’t capped, $BTC supply is. These are some of the reasons why $BTC is usually compared to Gold and hence the reference “Digital Gold”. Phew that turned into a big write up haha.